Forgot your password?
Search results
Did you not find what you were looking for? Try the Advanced Search for more precise search options.
30 items matching your criteria.
- madape.org/FD-Ag [1%] by dflynn, 2007-05-20 11:44
- Go here for all the latest results and R stuff... http://www.madape.org/FD-Ag (this is better than the columbia site for me, because I can use a ...
- Initial land use category results [1%] by dflynn, 2007-05-08 10:50
- Hi all-- I did analyses for mammals, birds, and plants by land use intensity category yesterday, and there are some kind of surprising ...
- Results and Paper [1%] by dflynn, 2007-05-08 10:31
- Re: Plants [1%] by dflynn, 2007-04-25 20:24
- hi guys -- I've done some analysis of the bird trait data from the bird/vert group -- see it at http://www.columbia.edu/~dff2101/FD-Ag/ Most of ...
- Re: Birds/other vertebrates [1%] by dflynn, 2007-04-25 20:23
- hi guys -- I've done some messing around with the bird trait data that you guys put together ('exploratory data analysis') -- see some of the figures at ...
- Re: Plants [1%] by dflynn, 2007-04-13 10:06
- Looks like there was some good discussion yesterday. Also, we all seem to be thinking on the same track about some things: 1. I looked at the Boutin & ...
- Re: Fungi [1%] by dflynn, 2007-04-11 06:54
- thanks, fabrice -- I just looked through it, and while there's great detail about the traits of the microbes, it doesn't focus on fungi, and doesn't have land ...
- Re: Plants [1%] by dflynn, 2007-04-09 10:50
- great-- I think urticles are definitely non-fleshy, unless you have reason to believe otherwise. I guess we'll have to be careful with legumes.
- Re: Plants [1%] by dflynn, 2007-04-05 17:57
- latest spreadsheet
- Re: Plants [1%] by dflynn, 2007-04-05 14:44
- I like x and blank because they're just more readable by humans -- we can change it to 1 /0 later if it looks necessary.. w3tropicos is great, I just ...
- Re: Other plants [1%] by dflynn, 2007-04-05 14:41
- --- reposted from emails--- The Lavorel et al paper brings up many of the important issues we should be thinking about -- and takes the approach ...
- Re: Plants [1%] by dflynn, 2007-04-05 11:54
- noted! see this new version also, I've found the AgroForestry Tree Database to be a nice tool
- Re: Plants [1%] by dflynn, 2007-04-04 10:37
- A template: For the categorical columns, click on a cell and pick from the choices (you'll see when you try it). Won't work if you change the location of ...
- Re: Plants [1%] by dflynn, 2007-04-04 06:38
- Notes from yesterday: We discussed three possible schemes: 1. LHS – Lavorel et al. Specific leaf area (or leaf size) + height + seed size. 2. Gillison's ...
- Re: Plants [1%] by dflynn, 2007-04-04 06:35
- Also, yesterday we talked about how classification schemes for animals are likely to be much broader than for plants -- so that we might want to make the ...
- Re: Plants [1%] by dflynn, 2007-04-04 06:35
- good ideas, melanie -- the master list makes a lot of sense. Could be another google spreadsheet... (unless people object)<br /><br />I'll put up a template ...
- Re: Stacy Philpott's ideas [1%] by dflynn, 2007-03-23 18:57
- in yesterday's chat, we discussed how to go about doing the search, and to what extent we need to standardize it. Also, we decided that we would all like to ...
- Stacy Philpott's ideas [1%] by dflynn, 2007-03-22 06:31
- ----reposted from email----- I would suggest that yes, you do need to demonstrate a thorough search. I would say this is especially important ...
- Meta-analysis [1%] by dflynn, 2007-03-22 07:30
- ideas about keywords and scope of search
- Arthropods [1%] by dflynn, 2007-03-21 16:41
- Group discussions [1%] by dflynn, 2007-03-21 17:38
- for each taxonomic group
- Chat 3-8 [1%] by dflynn, 2007-03-14 17:27
- (reposted)
- Google spreadsheet [1%] by dflynn, 2007-03-03 13:30
- Hi all-- We now have a preliminary way to organize papers for our theme group work, up here: ...
- Paper database [1%] by dflynn, 2007-03-02 06:32
- Chat 2-22 [1%] by dflynn, 2007-02-27 10:07
- Summary of our e-meeting from last week attached
- Re: Functional Diversity and Functional Classifications [1%] by dflynn, 2007-02-27 07:47
- Summary from last week's chat attached
- Re: Functional Diversity and Functional Classifications [1%] by dflynn, 2007-02-16 05:44
- Hi all- I'm working through my second year here at the E3B program at Columbia, and finally corralling my interests into a single research focus. I'm working ...
- Re: Which papers? Which data sets? [1%] by dflynn, 2007-02-12 12:49
- sorry, wrong link -- it's actually here
- Re: Which papers? Which data sets? [1%] by dflynn, 2007-02-12 12:48
- Hi Ashley -- the readings for this week (meta-analysis) includes Arnqvist & Wooster 1995, but the pdf linked to it is actually Hyatt et al 2003 -- I ...
- Re: Which papers? Which data sets? [1%] by dflynn, 2007-01-21 12:40
- Hello all -- I'm joining the DGS as part of the Columbia/AMNH contingent, and have started to look through the readings. One suggestion: would it be ...